Consulting Core Services
On-Site Training

GCA can orient the course to any  number of topics but typical ones have included:

  • Basics of the Federal Acquisition Regulation
  • FAR Cost Principles
  • Cost Accounting Standards
  • Working with DCAA
Contact Us

Don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions, comments, suggestions, or problems with registration.

Phone: 1-925-362-0712

Fax: 925-362-0806

Email GCA

Subscriber Login

Path: Consulting Services arrow Report & Digest arrow GCA Report Articles arrow GCA Report 2006 arrow Q&A: Changing Cellphone Charge Costs to Bill on Actual minutes used rather than Fixed Bill

Q&A: Changing Cellphone Charge Costs to Bill on Actual minutes used rather than Fixed Bill

Q.  My question relates to cell phone charges where the company pays a fixed rate per month for a fixed number of minutes.  Cell phones are used by employees which have mixture of personal use and business use on a direct contract for employees to communicate with prime contractor and government personnel.  My opinion is the company should allocate the fixed cell phone monthly charge between the contract and to the employees based on the percentage of total minutes actually used for business and personal usage (or allocate the personal use, if it is paid by company, to a fringe benefit pool).  I cannot locate anything specific in the FAR to support my opinion other than a gut feel that it is not proper to charge 100% of a fixed charge if there is non-business, non-contract related usage involved.

A.  There is really no guidance I am aware of that specifies how to charge the cost nor any one definitive way you should handle it.  I'm not sure from your question whether cell phone costs are charged direct to one cost type contract, is considered direct costs to several contracts or is included in an indirect cost pool.  But let me give you some general guidelines.

It is really a matter of judgment and materiality.  If cell phone costs are a material cost element (say more than 3-5 percent) of your indirect cost pool  then you might need to conduct an analysis of what is personal and what is not.  However, if it is an immaterial cost, the entire bill is commonly charged to the pool without the need to distinguish between personal and business expense unless you want to be both conservative and more precise (that's the judgment part). Be aware that once you start making the distinction, then you become vulnerable to assertions that your methodology is inaccurate and hence the cost can become unallowable. If telephone charges are direct charges of one or more contracts and they represent a material amount, then yes you might want to be more precise and conduct a personal versus business analysis and use the results of that analysis for determining costs charged. 

{TAG_FORM_TITLE}

To discuss your needs, contact Bill Lennett, Principal, at 1-925-362-0712 or email him at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .

*
 
*
 
*
 
 
*
 
 
 

 
GCA Subscription
REPORT FEATURES
  • New Developments-Rule Changes, New Guidelines, Court Decisions
  • Feature article for Small/New Contractors
  • Practical Q&A Sections

Download & View Sample


DIGEST FEATURES
  • Experts' Discussion of "HOT" Contracting Issues
  • Analyzing a Cost Principle or Cost Accounting Standard
  • Pricing Strategies
  • Case Studies on Challenges to Government Findings

Download & View Sample


SUBSCRIBER BENEFITS
  • Free use of our "Ask the Experts" panel where subscribers can submit questions to or chat with our network of eminent consultants and attorneys.
  • Electronic access to all prior newsletters through 2000. We provide state-of-the-art word search Word and linked electronic index to all articles.
  • Mailed hard copies and electronic versions will provide timely access to all newsletters.

 Learn More

 Subscribe