Consulting Core Services
On-Site Training

GCA can orient the course to any  number of topics but typical ones have included:

  • Basics of the Federal Acquisition Regulation
  • FAR Cost Principles
  • Cost Accounting Standards
  • Working with DCAA
Contact Us

Don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions, comments, suggestions, or problems with registration.

Phone: 1-925-362-0712

Fax: 925-362-0806

Email GCA

Subscriber Login

Path: Consulting Services arrow Report & Digest arrow GCA Report Articles arrow GCA Report 2007 arrow Q&A: Moving Incentive Compensations to Fringe Pool

Q&A: Moving Incentive Compensations to Fringe Pool

Q.  Our company has two accounts that accumulate costs for Incentive Compensation - Executive Incentive Compensation which is used to pay bonuses to high level executives and corporate officers, and Regular Incentive Compensation which is used to pay bonuses to all other employees.  Both of these accounts are part of our Fringe Pool and that practice was used in computing our 2007 provisional billing rates.  Now that 75% of our year is completed it appears that we are going to significantly over-run Fringe and significantly under-run Overhead and G&A. Would it be feasible for us to move Regular Incentive Compensation to our Overhead Pool and/or move Executive Incentive Compensation to our G&A pool? If feasible could we make this change retroactive to the beginning of the year? Would permission from the government be required? If permission from the government is not required, would we be required to notify them before they find out through a review of our indirect cost submission?

 

A.  The general rule is you need to be consistent with the way you propose and book costs so the retroactive changes you outline would be a significant uphill battle. You would have a better case making the change prospectively – that is after the current fiscal year. That said, however, I have seen contractors make the type of retroactive change you are proposing by presenting a strong position paper demonstrating the change is “desirable” e.g. represents a significantly better cost allocation method. In such a case, you may or may not have to demonstrate the cost impact of the change. You could argue, for example, that inclusion of the executive bonus in fringe benefits with total labor in the base represents a distortion since the bonus applies only to executives and should be assigned to G&A or similarly, the regular incentive compensation applies only to non-executives and hence is better included in the overhead pool. As for notification, since you are not CAS covered, you need not notify the government of the changes until you submit your incurred cost proposals where you need to clearly identify the changes.  However, contractors usually notify their ACO earlier as a courtesy.  You need to think hard how to handle it.

 

 

{TAG_FORM_TITLE}

To discuss your needs, contact Bill Lennett, Principal, at 1-925-362-0712 or email him at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .

*
 
*
 
*
 
 
*
 
 
 
GCA Subscription
REPORT FEATURES
  • New Developments-Rule Changes, New Guidelines, Court Decisions
  • Feature article for Small/New Contractors
  • Practical Q&A Sections

Download & View Sample


DIGEST FEATURES
  • Experts' Discussion of "HOT" Contracting Issues
  • Analyzing a Cost Principle or Cost Accounting Standard
  • Pricing Strategies
  • Case Studies on Challenges to Government Findings

Download & View Sample


SUBSCRIBER BENEFITS
  • Free use of our "Ask the Experts" panel where subscribers can submit questions to or chat with our network of eminent consultants and attorneys.
  • Electronic access to all prior newsletters through 2000. We provide state-of-the-art word search Word and linked electronic index to all articles.
  • Mailed hard copies and electronic versions will provide timely access to all newsletters.

 Learn More

 Subscribe